KuraFire

  • Archive
  • RSS
  • Ask me anything
A court in France has ordered a man to pay €10,000 ($13,500) in damages to his long-frustrated ex-wife after he failed in his marriage “duties” by withholding sex from her for years.

Husband ordered to pay wife for lack of sex

Withholding sex from your spouse can lead to financial ruin.

(via thunderdolt)

But honey, which came first? The financial ruin or the withholding of sex? (Trick question because nobody is coming, ever!)

——— Faruk: ———

Interesting role reversal; in most Western cultu… okay, no, in the U.S.A. the courts are still likely to rule that a man deserves to have sex whenever he wants it from his wife, once married, and that she should submit to that. 

Can’t say I agree with the French court, or the wife for monetarily suing her ex-husband over not providing sex, unless they both (or the wife alone) paid for extensive couple’s therapy for a long period of time prior to the divorce, and this lawsuit is to recuperate on the financial loss of that. But the article does not suggest anything like that took place, nor provide enough details to do a deeper search (and my French is virtually absent, to boot).

That said, whilst I may not agree, I also don’t feel bad for the guy; women have been imprisoned, beaten, and even killed in reverse-gender versions of this situation for as long as history has records on this. Perhaps this will get men all around to be more aware of gender disparities.

(via vmarinelli)

Source: watoday.com.au

  • 6 months ago > indefensible
  • 44
  • Permalink
  • Share
    Tweet

44 Notes/ Hide

  1. cranberryflags liked this
  2. themikestand liked this
  3. farmpuma liked this
  4. catty1 liked this
  5. whiteelephantintheroom liked this
  6. groverviolet liked this
  7. kimplasters liked this
  8. theungracefulone liked this
  9. mattdoucette liked this
  10. redcloud liked this
  11. monkeyfrog reblogged this from kurafire
  12. kivitasku reblogged this from kurafire
  13. phyllis-stein liked this
  14. kurafire reblogged this from vmarinelli and added:
    ——— Faruk: ——— Interesting role reversal; in most Western cultu… okay, no, in the U.S.A. the courts are still likely to...
  15. vmarinelli reblogged this from thunderdolt
  16. rondicasmith liked this
  17. monkeyfrog liked this
  18. ashamedtosay liked this
  19. davesnothere liked this
  20. ripslich liked this
  21. pegobry reblogged this from indefensible
  22. tymethiefslongerthoughts liked this
  23. muffpunch liked this
  24. dolanite liked this
  25. ladameblanc liked this
  26. ivegotzooms liked this
  27. knitterplease reblogged this from indefensible
  28. chronically-awesome liked this
  29. smashedperderders reblogged this from indefensible
  30. eoporto said: This is totally reasonable. I can tell because if it was reversed no one would mention prostitution
  31. therealpottymouth liked this
  32. roothakers liked this
  33. roothakers said: I would owe like twice that…
  34. andwhenithappens liked this
  35. beefranck liked this
  36. altereds reblogged this from indefensible
  37. squibble liked this
  38. marleymarley liked this
  39. timfsbrown liked this
  40. thunderdolt reblogged this from indefensible and added:
    Withholding sex from your spouse can lead to financial ruin.
  41. altereds liked this
  42. halfbakedidea liked this
  43. claviusrobinsky liked this
  44. indefensible posted this
← Previous • Next →

About

A designer, developer and entreprenerd.

Main blog at: farukat.es

Twitter

loading tweets…

  • RSS
  • Random
  • Archive
  • Ask me anything
  • Mobile

Effector Theme by Carlo Franco.

Powered by Tumblr